Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Hitchcock

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 31, 1967No. 42847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

1. The “bad faith” which will authorize recovery of attorney’s fees in an action seeking damages and attorney’s fees under Code § 20-1404 is “bad faith” in the *564transaction out of which the cause of action arose. Traders Ins. Co. v. Mann, 118 Ga. 381 (6, 7), 384 (45 SE 426); McKenzie v. Mitchell, 123 Ga. 72 (51 SE 34); Lovell v. Frankum, 145 Ga. 106 (88 SE 569).

Where, as here, a petition seeking damages for the alleged wrongful repossession of an automobile alleges that the defendant finance company wilfully, intentionally, and maliciously and without probable cause repossessed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. O'BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Traders Insurance v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Lovell v. FrankumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. McKenzie v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Lawrence v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. T. G. & Y. Stores Co. v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. SpicerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Smith v. VarnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Ali v. World Omni Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API