Legal Opinion

In Re Kapsos

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided February 8, 1982No. 18-25091PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The debtors in this chapter 7 case have moved for voluntary dismissal. (C. P. No. 17). The trustee has objected. (C. P. No. 19). The motion was heard on February 2.

The debtors’ discharge was denied under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) and (B) [fraudulent transfers both before and after bankruptcy]) (4)(A) [false oath], and (5) [failure to explain loss of assets]. Bkrtcy, 16 B.R. 280. Discharge had been opposed by the trustee. The trustee has scheduled a public auction sale of the debtors’ non-exempt household…

2Cases cited1 opinion

Wendel v. Kapsos (In Re Kapsos)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

In Re Mathis Insurance Agency, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1985
In Re HarkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995
In Re HeatleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
Penick v. TiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
Marceita A. Penick A/K/A Marceita A. Brown and Marceita B. Penick v. Douglas O. Tice, Jr., in Re Marceita A. Penick A/K/A Marceita A. Brown and Marceita B. Penick, Debtor. Director and Counsel, Executive Office for U.S. Trustees, U.S. Dept. Of Justice, Amicus Curiae. Antoinette Flanagan Scarborough v. Douglas O. Tice, Jr., Director and Counsel, Executive Office for U.S. Trustees, U.S. Dept. Of Justice, Amicus Curiae. In Re Antoinette Flanagan Scarborough, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984