Legal Opinion
Penick v. Tice
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1984No. Nos. 82-1883(L), 82-1884PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge:
The Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases1 of Marceita A. Penick and Antoinette F. Scarborough present identical issues and have been consolidated for this appeal. The bankruptcy court granted each debtor’s application for voluntary dismissal on the grounds that no creditors objected and the trustee in bankruptcy had standing to object only for the purpose of insuring that he was paid his reasonable fees and expenses. The decisions of the bankruptcy judge were affirmed by the district court. Douglas O. Tice, Jr., trustee, seeks reversal of both decisions below on the grounds that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gill v. Hall (In Re Hall)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- In re Sig. H. Rosenblatt & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Matter of BlackmonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
- In Re WirickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
- In Re CarrollUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re McCulloughUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- In Re KomyathyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- In Re GallagherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1987
- In Re WildeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993
- In Re AstinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.