Mata v. State

RICKHOFF, Justice.

A jury found the appellant, Henry Mata, guilty of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced him to eight years confinement. In three points of error, Mata complains about the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction and contends the State’s jury argument during the punishment phase deprived him of due process. Because we find no reversible error, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Summary of Facts

Henry Mata was tried with Carlos Caldera and Robert Salazar. At their trial, the complainant testified that she met them at a graduation party and agreed to take them…