Hight v. . Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, C. J.
It is recognized in this jurisdiction that, except in case of necessaries or contracts authorized by statute, an infant may avoid his contracts concerning personalty on account of his infancy; and, either during his minority or on coming of age, if be acts promptly in the matter and on such avoidance, be may recover the consideration paid by him, either in money or property, with the limitation that be must restore the consideration received if be still has the same in band, or return or account for the value of property in which it has been invested and which is still under his control and…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Cole v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Cole v. . WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Barnett v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Collins Ex Rel. Collins v. Norfleet-Baggs, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- McCormick v. . CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.