Legal Opinion

Doan v. Commission on Judicial Performance

California Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1995No. S043789PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

These are formal judicial disciplinary proceedings under section 18 of article VI of the California Constitution. Under former subdivision (c) thereof, the Commission on Judicial Performance (hereafter sometimes the Commission) has recommended that we remove from office Glenda Kraft Doan, a judge of the municipal court, for certain misconduct that “occurr[ed] not more than 6 years prior to the commencement of [her] current term”—specifically, “wilful misconduct in office,” “conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute,”…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Kloepfer v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Cannon v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. ZackeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Broadman v. Commission on Judical PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Smith v. Selma Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Dodds v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API