Charles Chandler v. State
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiff appeals from a dismissal of a “Petition for Extraordinary Relief’ under Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 75 and Vermont Rule of Appellate Procedure 21. Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in construing and dismissing his pleading as a successive petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) that raises claims decided on the merits in an earlier PCR proceeding under 13 V.S.A. § 7134. He argues that the bar on successive applications does not apply to his extraordinary relief petition and, in any event, his petition is not a successive application because his claims regarding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- John Hubicki v. Acf Industries, Incorporated, John Hubicki v. United Steelworkers of America and Acf Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Ball v. Melsur Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In Re LawsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- State v. RussoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In re ChandlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Edwin A. Towne, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018