Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2006No. 43473PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J. :

In this appeal, we consider whether NRS 62C.010(2)(a), the Juvenile Courts statute requiring parental notification that a child is in custody, precludes law enforcement interviews of juveniles suspected of criminal misconduct. We conclude that the absence of notification under the provision does not preclude juvenile interviews and, further, does not bar eventual admission at trial of voluntary statements taken during such interviews. We also conclude that parental notification or presence during juvenile interviews is only a factor in resolving whether such…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Byford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Lourenzy Stone, A/K/A Lorenzo L. Stone-Bey v. Robert A. Farley and Pamela Carter, Indiana Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Collman v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jeremias v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Somee v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hannon v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hubbard v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Ford v. BeanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API