Legal Opinion
O'HARA CORPORATION v. AUTONAV MARINE SYSTEMS INC
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 27, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00467Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE O’HARA CORP., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 2:19-cv-00467-NT ) AUTONAV MARINE SYSTEMS, ) INC., ) ) and ) ) ) PAUL WAGNER, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Before me is the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). (“Defs.’ Mot.”) (ECF No. 7). For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. BACKGROUND When evaluating a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, I take “the plaintiff’s properly documented evidentiary proffers…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Richard A. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A. Ronald L. Motley, Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent P.A. Richard F. ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.