Legal Opinion
L & S Hospital & Institutional Supplies Co. v. Hynes
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1975PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Birns, J.
This is an application pursuant to CPLR 2304 to quash certain subpoenas duces tecum issued by the respondent Special Prosecutor for Nursing Homes (hereafter Special Prosecutor). The subpoenas are returnable before the New York County Grand Jury investigating nursing homes and were served on several banking institutions in order to obtain the bank records of both the corporate and the individual petitioners.
Petitioners’ objections to the subpoenas fall into three basic categories: (1) the Grand Jury was improperly impaneled and extended, (2) the Special Prosecutor is not properly authorized to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- People v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- People v. Tru-Sport Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Landau v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Shapiro v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- Agnello v. ArmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- L & S Hospital & Institutional Supplies, Inc. v. LefkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Doe v. KurianskyNew York Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.