Foster County State Bank v. Lammers
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Washington county to recover $449.18, balance alleged to be due upon a promissory note. The case was tried before Stolberg, J., who, at the close of the testimony, directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $477.47. From an order denying the motion of the defendants other than T. F. MeCue for an order setting aside the verdict and for a new trial, they appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
This action was brought to recover from defendants a balance of $449.18 and interest on a promissory note for $3,000 executed by defendants at Minneapolis, October 8, 1909, payable sixty days after date at Carrington, North Dakota, with interest at seven per cent per annum until paid.
The defendants other than McOue answered, admitting the execution of the note, and setting up the following defense: That on February 18, 1910, defendants Savage and Kinsey paid to plaintifE at St. Paul the sum of $879.70 upon the note, and on June 14, 1910, the other answering defendants, four in number, paid to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Duluth Chamber of Commerce v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Marion v. HeimbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Demeules v. Jewel Tea Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- First State Bank v. SchatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- C. S. Brackett Co. v. LofgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Burns v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Tupper v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Edwards v. Svea Fire & Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.