Legal Opinion
People v. Eastmond
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided April 3, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*825OPINION OF THE COURT
Marc J. Whiten, J.
The defendant, Daven Eastmond, is charged with one count of criminal trespass in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.15), and has filed a motion seeking dismissal for facial insufficiency.
In order to be facially sufficient, an information must substantially conform to the formal requirements of CPL 100.15. Additionally, the factual portion and any accompanying depositions must provide reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense charged, as well as nonhearsay factual allegations of an evidentiary character which, if true, establish every…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GarciaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2014
- People v. Porter (Valerie)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017