Legal Opinion

Jaenicke v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 12, 2003No. 01-02-00850-CRPublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

TIM TAFT, Justice.

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing of our opinion issued May 15, 2003. We deny that motion. However, we withdraw our May 15 opinion and issue this one in its stead.

The trial court found appellant, Christopher Lee Jaenieke, guilty of aggravated assault and assessed punishment at 20 years in prison. We address whether the trial court’s assessment of the maximum punishment based on jury verdicts in other cases constitutes fundamental error and, alternatively, whether appellant was denied the effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Roman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. Adams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  3. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  4. Marrow v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  5. Boler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API