Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Hurley

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1999No. E023510Published

1Opinion of the Court

90 Cal.Rptr.2d 697 (1999)

76 Cal.App.4th 797

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Luzestela HURLEY, Defendant and Appellant.

No. E023510.

Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Two.

December 2, 1999.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing December 17, 1999.

Review Denied February 16, 2000.

Richard P. Siref, San Diego, for Defendant and Appellant.

Roberts & Morgan, Bruce Morgan, Aaron Hancock, Riverside, Hollins, Schechter, Feinstein & Condas and Jack H. Snyder, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

RICHLI, Acting P.J.

Insurance Code section 11580.2, subdivision (p)(3),[1] provides that…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Gaut; Concurrence · Ward.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API