Legal Opinion

WHITNEY NAT. BANK v. Smith

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1993No. 90-CA-110PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

613 So.2d 312 (1993)

WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK OF NEW ORLEANS

v.

Cecil G. Smith, Jr., a/k/a, Gill Smith.

No. 90-CA-110.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

February 11, 1993.

Daniel J. Mulholland, Alan W. Perry, Fred Krutz, III, Forman Perry Watkins & Krutz, Jackson, for appellant.

Terryl K. Rushing, Alston Rutherford Tardy & Van Slyke, Jackson, R.L. Netterville, Natchez, for appellee.

En Banc.

BANKS, Justice, for the Court:

Here we are compelled to treat an instance wherein a court, without notice to the plaintiff, entered an ex parte order amending a previous order, from dismissal of plaintiff's claim without…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell v. City of Bay St. LouisMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., Inc. v. George E. Breece Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. Hanil Bank v. MichelmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Lester Eng. Co. v. Richland Water & Sewer Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Busching v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Townsend v. TownsendMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. RN Turnbow Oil Investments v. McIntoshMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. City of Horn Lake, Mississippi v. Sass Muni-V, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Scott v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API