Scott v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIS, P.J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Darnice Scott appeals the chancery court’s amendment of an order that divided her ex-husband Jerry Scott’s retirement benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act. She argues that the chancellor erred in classifying the error in the order as a clerical mistake under Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a). On appeal, Darnice argues that the chancellor erred: (1) in amending the order dividing Jerry’s railroad retirement benefits and (2) in denying attorney’s fees to Darnice. We find no error and affirm.
FACTS
¶ 2. Darnice and Jerry were married on July 21, 1973.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- East v. EastMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- West v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Ivison v. IvisonMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Townsend v. TownsendMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- WHITNEY NAT. BANK v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Archie v. ArchieCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013