Legal Opinion

Scott v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided October 30, 2012No. 2011-CA-00736-COAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIS, P.J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Darnice Scott appeals the chancery court’s amendment of an order that divided her ex-husband Jerry Scott’s retirement benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act. She argues that the chancellor erred in classifying the error in the order as a clerical mistake under Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a). On appeal, Darnice argues that the chancellor erred: (1) in amending the order dividing Jerry’s railroad retirement benefits and (2) in denying attorney’s fees to Darnice. We find no error and affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2. Darnice and Jerry were married on July 21, 1973.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. East v. EastMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  2. West v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ivison v. IvisonMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Townsend v. TownsendMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  5. WHITNEY NAT. BANK v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Archie v. ArchieCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API