Legal Opinion
Han Beauty, Inc. And Trevive, Inc. v. Alberto-Culver Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 9, 2001No. 00-1198, 99,090PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (the Board) sustained Aberto-Culver Co.’s opposition to Han Beauty Inc.’s application for registration of the mark TREVIVE NUTRIENTS FOR THE LIFE OF YOUR HAIR and design (the TREVIVE mark). Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s likelihood of confusion findings, and because the Board’s conclusion is correct, this court affirms.
I
In 1959, Aberto-Culver and its predecessors acquired the rights to use the mark TRESEMME for hair spray, permanent wave, hair conditioners, hair thickeners, wig sprays,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Recot, Inc. v. M.C. BectonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Am General Corporation and General Motors Corporation v. Daimlerchrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Herbko International, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In Re Viterra Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Hewlett-Packard Company v. Packard Press, Inc. (Formerly Packquisition Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.