Campbell v. Darling & Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
*291DISSENTING OPINION
White, J.
To be represented by counsel in the prosecution of one’s claim before the Industrial Board is a right, not a courtesy to be extended or withheld as the Board sees fit. The right to counsel is a right to adequate representation. Uninformed counsel cannot give adequate representation. There may well be justification for the Board’s failure to put appellant’s new attorney’s name on its mailing list. That should not be the question. The pertinent question is whether appellant should be denied consideration of his application for review merely because his attorney was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Homan v. Belleville Lumber and Supply Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1937
- In re AleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Gould Motor Co. v. VierraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
- Feiock v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.