Legal Opinion

In re Ale

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1917No. 10,168PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From tlie Industrial Board of Indiana. Certified questions of law. Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act in the matter of one Lnna Ale and others. Certified questions of law by the Industrial Board.

1Opinion of the Court

Batman, P. J. —

Under the provisions of §61 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915 (Acts 1915 p. 392), as amended by the act of 1917 (Acts 1917 p. *146154), the Industrial Board has certified to this court certain questions of law, based upon the facts presented by a proceedings pending before that body, seeking the opinion of this court for guidance in determining such proceeding. From the statement of facts submitted it appears that on and prior to January 23,1917, one Samuel C. Ale, who was a resident of Fairmount, Indiana, was in the employment of the National Drain Tile Company as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Borer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Lytle v. the State of ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Wabash Railroad v. DykemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bank of Westfield v. InmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Frazer v. McMillin & CarsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. McGuire v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API