Legal Opinion

United States v. Ortiz

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 25, 2000No. NMCM 99 00990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DORMAN, Senior Judge:

A military judge, sitting as a special court-martial, convicted the appellant, consistent with his pleas, of conspiracy to obstruct justice, four specifications of making false official statements, larceny, wrongful appropriation, adultery, and obstruction of justice. These offenses violated Articles 81, 107, 121, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 907, 921, and 934 (1994). The approved sentence includes a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 100 days; and reduction to E-l. Automatic forfeiture of $300 pay per month was deferred by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. United States v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. ReistCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. United States v. WatkinsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BruceNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  2. United States v. McGrewNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  3. United States v. WilsonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API