Legal Opinion

Warren Bros. v. Kibbe

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 15, 1925No. 8726PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAN, District Judge.

This is a suit brought by a patentee against the state highway commission and divers and sundry contractors and their sureties to recover a royalty on the infringement of the plaintiff’s patent.

The case is important and has been extensively briefed. I have examined the briefs and authorities there cited as far as the time at my disposal would permit. I have not been able, or have not had time, to formulate an elaborate opinion, but I shall state briefly, and without citation of authorities, the conclusions at which I have arrived.

It appears from the bill that in 1919 and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cookingham v. Warren Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Copper S. S. Co. v. State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  3. Lemelson v. Ampex CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  4. College Savings Bank, and United States v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Hercules Inc. v. Minnesota State Highway DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API