Warren Bros. v. Kibbe
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
BEAN, District Judge.
This is a suit brought by a patentee against the state highway commission and divers and sundry contractors and their sureties to recover a royalty on the infringement of the plaintiff’s patent.
The case is important and has been extensively briefed. I have examined the briefs and authorities there cited as far as the time at my disposal would permit. I have not been able, or have not had time, to formulate an elaborate opinion, but I shall state briefly, and without citation of authorities, the conclusions at which I have arrived.
It appears from the bill that in 1919 and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cookingham v. Warren Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- First State Bank v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Copper S. S. Co. v. State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Lemelson v. Ampex CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- College Savings Bank, and United States v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Hercules Inc. v. Minnesota State Highway DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.