Legal Opinion
Todicheeney v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 17, 2022No. 3:21-cv-08003Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Leland Todicheeney, No. CV-21-08003-PCT-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Leland Todicheeney’s Motion for Summary 16 Judgment (Doc. 14) and Defendant Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation’s 17 (“ONHIR”) Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16). For the reasons that follow, 18 Defendant’s Cross Motion is granted and Plaintiff’s Motion is denied. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 A. The Settlement Act 21 Prior to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Leonardo S. ORTEZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.