Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Paul Kevin Waterman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 10, 2017No. 16–1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Justice.

An attorney had an intimate relationship with a client while representing the client in a dissolution proceeding. The attorney withdrew from representation before the case concluded and self-reported his conduct to the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board (the Board). The Board charged the attorney with violating Iowa Rule of Professional Conduct 32:1.8(j).

The parties stipulated as to facts and as to the violation of rule 32:1.8®. The parties also jointly recommended a thirty-day suspension. Following a formal hearing, the grievance commission concluded the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. William S. MorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. MarzenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Mason James OuderkirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Lawrence L. LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Jon JacobsmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Melissa NineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Beau A. BergmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Jon JacobsmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API