Chapman v. Hopper

(after.stating the facts as above). The proposition stated in the brief of plaintiffs in error, as based on the sixth assignment of error, presents in effect the point in view, viz., that the legal effect attaching to the evidence is to deny the defendant' in error allowance and payment of the claim sued for out of the guaranty fund. According to the undisputed evidence, heretofore stated, “the directors of the bank” had a conference with the special agent of the state banking department, with the view and for the purpose of increasing the bank’s available funds, the bank at the time being in…