Legal Opinion

COTE v. SCHNELL INDUSTRIES

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 2022No. 4:18-cv-01440Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAYTON COTE, No. 4:18-CV-01440 Plaintiff, (Chief Judge Brann) v. SCHNELL INDUSTRIES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION NOVEMBER 8, 2022 In advance of trial in this strict products liability case concerning a machine involved in a workplace accident that nearly severed Plaintiff Dayton Cote’s hand, the parties filed competing motions in limine. Although the Court grants Cote’s motions to preclude evidence and argument on parties and claims that have been removed from this suit, the remaining motions—most notably, Defendant…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Ohler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. West Run Student Housing Associates, LLC v. Huntington National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. Intergen N v. v. GrinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. 188 LLC v. Trinity Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API