Legal Opinion

State v. Forrest

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2013No. 2012-0415 and 2012-0416PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

{¶ 1} This case presents the question whether a three-judge panel of appellate judges — instead of the full court — may review a party’s application for en banc consideration in order to determine whether an intradistrict conflict exists. We hold that it may.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} On May 16, 2009, appellee, Al E. Forrest, was sitting in a parked vehicle on Omar Drive in Columbus. A Columbus police officer approached the vehicle, observed Forrest’s behavior, and ordered Forrest to exit the car. Forrest ignored the officer, so the officer opened the door and pulled Forrest out. As he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DeHart v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In re J.J.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. McFadden v. Cleveland State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In re Disqualification of SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frash v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. OwenOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Key Realty, Ltd. v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Courthouse Crossing Acquisitions, LLCOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. CaulleyOhio Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API