Legal Opinion
Siert v. Spiffy Franchising, LLC.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 9, 2024No. 5:24-cv-01771Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ALINA SIERT, et al., Case No. 5:24-cv-01771-EJD 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 10 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION 11 SPIFFY FRANCHISING, LLC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendants. 12 13 Franchisee Plaintiffs Alina Siert and A4H, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) bring claims against 14 Franchisor Defendants Spiffy Franchising, LLC, Get Spiffy, Inc., Scot Wingo, Karl Murphy, and 15 Connor Finnegan (“Defendants”) arising from Defendants’ alleged fraudulent business practices 16 and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Smith v. SpizzirriSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.