Legal Opinion

Aus v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1979No. Civ. 9590PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSON, Justice.

The plaintiff and appellant, George W. Aus [“Aus”], has appealed from the judgment of the Stutsman County District Court which affirmed the decision of the North Dakota Workmen’s Compensation Bureau [“Bureau”] denying Aus’s claim for total disability benefits. Aus contends that the findings of fact in the Bureau’s order denying liability are not supported by the evidence and that Aus is entitled to total disability benefits from the Bureau. Alternatively, Aus contends that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claim.

On October 20, 1975, Aus was injured within the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bank of Hamilton v. State Banking BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. O'Brien v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Foss v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weber v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Manikowske v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Aus v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API