Legal Opinion

Meyers v. C., R. I. & P. R.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 1881PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Pottawattamie Circuit Court. The plaintiff claims of the defendant one hundred and five dollars, for the killing of a cow. The cause was tried to the court on an agreed statement of facts. J udgment was rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Day. J.

i. munkotal tion'sforci!minces: iim¡tingsaeedor railway trains. Upon rhe trial it was agreed that the animal in controversy was killed by a train of the defendant, running upon the track of its railroad, at a point within the limits of the city of Council Bluffs; that , , the value ox the animal killed was one hundred and five dollars; that the train was running at a greater rate of speed than four miles per hour; and that an ordinance of the city of Council Bluffs, in force at the time the animal was killed, prohibited the running of trains at a greater rate of speed than four miles…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tugman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. City of JacksonvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Hayes v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Clason v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Burg v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Masser v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Neary v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of Crown PointIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API