Legal Opinion

Marcinak v. Southeastern Greene School District

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1988No. 1417PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

The Plaintiff-Appellant, Gerald Marcinak, instituted the instant action seeking the payment of a retirement benefit which he alleged he was entitled to pursuant to the terms of an employment contract between himself and the Appellee Southeastern Greene School District. The employment contract applied to the Appellant’s position as Superintendent of the District for a three year term. The dispute was heard before the trial court, sitting without a jury. It determined that the Appellant was not entitled to the retirement benefit he sought.

The Appellant contends that the trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Community College v. Community College, Society of the FacultySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. East Crossroads Center, Inc. v. Mellon-Stuart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. In Re Estate of BreyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Minnotte AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Wrenfield Homeowners Ass'n v. DeYoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. E-Z Parks, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Homart Development Co. v. SgrenciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. MATX, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API