Tatum State Bank v. Gibson

(after' stating the case as above). [1, 2] The bank makes the complaint that (1) the costs in both the justice and county courts were taxed against it, althoug-h the judgment of the county court was for a less amount than that of the justice court, and (2) the evidence does not establish any liability on the part of the garnishee. The bank was entitled to recover the costs of the county court under article 2065, R. S.; but that point is solved by the ruling upon the second point, which operates to be decisive of the garnishment proceedings. It is believed that the circumstances do not show…