Legal Opinion

People v. Monroe

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1902No. Crim. No. 831PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant was found guilty of selling intoxicating liquor to one Sam Osborn, an Indian, and fined in the sum of five hundred dollars, with the alternative of imprisonment in the county jail one day for each two dollars thereof, and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

The defendant kept a saloon and small store at Dunlap. Dave Works, a half-breed Indian, to whom intoxicating liquors might lawfully be sold, had been accused by the defendant of abusing his privilege by buying liquor and giving or selling it to the Indians, and for that reason, as he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Woon Tuck WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. CarmeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. People v. FossettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API