Reynolds v. Bickel

INTRODUCTION

Justice DURHAM, opinion of the Court:

11 Plaintiff Seott Reynolds appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for Tanner L.C. and Jeffrey Bickel (Defendants). The district court held that Defendants are not liable to Mr. Reynolds because they did not "identifly] in writing to the[ir] client that the professional services performed on behalf of the client were intended to be relied upon by" Mr. Reynolds, as required by Utah Code section 58-262-602(2)(b). We reverse.

BACKGROUND

1 2 In July 2010, Seott Reynolds was negotiating the sale of three limited liability companies of…