Legal Opinion
Reinhart v. Birmingham, City of
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 26, 2024No. 2:22-cv-11074Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN REINHART, Plaintiff Case No. 22-cv-11074 v. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, Defendant. __________________________________/ OPINION & ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. 72) AND (2) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDERS (Dkt. 75) Two motions are before the Court: the City of Birmingham’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 72) and the City’s motion to dismiss for violating court orders (Dkt. 75).1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tennessee v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.