Legal Opinion

Waukesha County Department of Social Services v. Loper

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1972No. 276PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue is whether the amended complaints state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action.

This court has consistently stated that when challenged by demurrer the complaint must be liberally construed in favor of the pleading. In London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. American State Bank (1943), 244 Wis. 203, 207, 12 N. W. 2d 133, we repeated the rule, using this language :

“ ‘Contrary to the common-law rule, every reasonable intendment and presumption is to be made in favor of the pleading, and it will not be set aside on demurrer unless it be so fatally defective, that, taking all the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. CaldwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Fisher v. ShelverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Massey v. RichmondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. American State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southeast Bank v. IP Sarullo Ent.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Stein v. Zarling (In Re Zarling)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987
  3. WAUKESHA COUNTY DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. LoperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Mid-South Bank & Trust Co., V.R. Williams & Co., and Franklin County Bank v. Paul Max Quandt Estate, Nelle S. Quandt, Jessica Quandt, Paul Quandt, Jr., and Paux Max Quandt, IIICourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API