State v. Jordan

(dissenting) — The majority opinion herein is unique in that all of the prior decisions of this court which it cites, including the one it quotes, hold precisely to the contrary of the view which the majority adopts herein. See State v. Darden, 30 Wn. App. 460, 465-66, 635 P.2d 760 (1981), review granted, 96 Wn.2d 1025 (1982); State v. Schmidt, 30 Wn. App. 887, 897-98, 639 P.2d 754 (1982); State v. Kray, 31 Wn. App. 388, 389, 641 P.2d 1210 (1982).

I agree with our prior decisions, and consider the views as expressed by Judge Swanson in Schmidt to be particularly persuasive.

In any event, this…