Legal Opinion

Teitle v. London & Lancashire Insurance

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1950No. 212PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.

This is an action of contract to recover on a fire insurance policy for claimed damages to the plaintiffs’ stock of goods, store and office furniture and fixtures and wearing apparel. The property was located in a drug store owned by the plaintiffs. The trial was by jury and the only question submitted was as to the amount of damages. The case is here on exceptions of the defendant relating to the admission of certain evidence in the way of exhibits, and otherwise, and to its denial of its motion to set aside the verdict.

The first exception briefed by the. defendant is to the claimed error in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ConeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  2. Purington v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
  3. Labounty v. LafleurSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re MonaghanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  2. State v. TeitleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  3. A. Brown, Inc. v. Vermont Justin Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. LeBlanc v. DeslandesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  5. Smith v. De MetreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API