Legal Opinion
Massachusetts Bay Insurance v. Bushmaster Firearms, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 20, 2004No. CIV.03-52-P-HPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HORNBY, District Judge.
John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo used a Bushmaster XM-15 E2S .223 caliber semi-automatic assault rifle for their terrible shooting rampage in the fall of 2002. The defendant Bushmaster manufactured the weapon in Windham, Maine. Muhammad and Malvo obtained the weapon from Bull’s Eye Shooter Supply, a retail dealer in the State of Washington. Victims and families of victims have sued Bull’s Eye and its owners, Muhammad, Malvo, Bushmaster and unnamed gun distributors in Washington State Court, seeking…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Brazas Sporting Arms, Inc. v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. Inhabitants of TopshamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- American Protection Insurance v. Acadia Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Vandervort v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Traveler's Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Actavis, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- The Traveler's Property Casualty Company of America v. Actavis, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017