Legal Opinion
Yetiv v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 20, 2007No. 04-76044PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CANBY; Concurrence by Judge NOONAN.
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Jack Yetiv and his wholly-owned TREIMee Corporation (collectively, “Ye-tiv”) petition for review of an administrative decision of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) imposing civil monetary penalties under 12 U.S.C. § 1735f-15(c). The penalties were imposed for Yetiv’s failure to provide HUD with audited annual financial statements relating to the operation of Ye-tiv’s multi-family housing project, which Yetiv purchased with a HUD-insured loan. Yetiv presents numerous challenges to HUD’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. Tosco Corporation, Diablo Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Saratoga Savings and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Reich v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria v. DutschkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Associated Mortgage Bankers, Inc. v. CastroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Egae, LLC v. UshudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Ola Properties Inc v. HUDCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Ola Properties Inc. v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.