Legal Opinion

Holdom v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin N. Carter, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court confirming a special assessment for the paving of Forty-seventh street, from the east line of Paulina street to the east line of Western avenue boulevard, in the city of Chicago. Various errors have been assigned by appellants, but in the absence of any briefs on the part of the city we shall notice a few of them only.

Appellants insist that the assessment is erroneous because two certain lots fronting on the line of the proposed improvement were not assessed. It was, however, held by this court in Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hutt v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hayne v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. City of Seattle v. PeabodyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Roberts v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. City of Waukegan v. DrobnickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Seattle Mattress & Upholstery Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API