Burns v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The Delaware and Hudson Company, from a judgment of' the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of 'the cleric of the county of Bensselaer on the 15th day of May, 1905, upon the verdict of,a jury for $1,000, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 15th day of May, 1905, denying the defendant’s motion fora new trial" made upon the minutes. • The action is for negligence.
1Opinion of the Court
Kellogg, J.:
At Troy the defendant and several other railroad companies used the Troy Union Bailroad pompany’s passenger' station, that company having control of the station and tracks and the direction and' dictation of; the movement of trains into and out.of the station and the place they shall occupy and the- time when they shall enter and leave the station. The station occupied the entire space between Fulton street .and Broadway, and there weré seven of its tracks *593running through the station and across Fulton street. The defendant’s engine, with a passenger train attached, was in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scaggs v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Laible v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Laible v. New York Central and Hudson River Rail. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- Killen v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Burns v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- McBride v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927