Legal Opinion

Berkom v. Cordonnier

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2011No. 20110085PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Marilyn Cordonnier, Brenda Klitzke, Darwin Van Berkom, Bradley Van Berkom, Mark Barenthsen, and Kathryn Barenthsen (collectively “Cordonniers”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment quieting title of an undivided one-half interest of the disputed mineral rights in favor of James and Betty Van Berkom. We hold the trial court’s finding that the Cordonniers did not prove the presence of a mutual mistake justifying reformation by clear, satisfactory, specific, and convincing evidence is not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

I

[¶2] In 1979, James and Betty Van Berkom executed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ell v. EllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. May v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flynn v. Hurley Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Schindler v. WagemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Flynn v. Hurley Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Misty McCartney v. David Burns and Melissa HabermanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2026
  5. Schindler v. WagemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API