Berkom v. Cordonnier
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Marilyn Cordonnier, Brenda Klitzke, Darwin Van Berkom, Bradley Van Berkom, Mark Barenthsen, and Kathryn Barenthsen (collectively “Cordonniers”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment quieting title of an undivided one-half interest of the disputed mineral rights in favor of James and Betty Van Berkom. We hold the trial court’s finding that the Cordonniers did not prove the presence of a mutual mistake justifying reformation by clear, satisfactory, specific, and convincing evidence is not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.
I
[¶2] In 1979, James and Betty Van Berkom executed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Ell v. EllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- May v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flynn v. Hurley Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Schindler v. WagemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Flynn v. Hurley Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Misty McCartney v. David Burns and Melissa HabermanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2026
- Schindler v. WagemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019