Legal Opinion

United States v. Massei

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1958No. 98PublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals has based its remand in part on the absence of “proof of likely source,” which it regards as an “indispensable” element of the net worth method, citing Holland v. United States, 348 U. S. 121, in support of its conclusion. In Holland we held that proof of a likely source was “sufficient” to convict in a net worth case where the Government did not negative all the possible nontaxable sources of the alleged net worth increase. This was not intended to imply that proof of a likely source was necessary in every case. On the contrary, should all possible sources of nontaxable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. William v. Massei v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. Parks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Arthur BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  3. John Factor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. United States v. Joseph L. SclafaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. United States v. Joseph F. SchipaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API