Legal Opinion

Cain v. Larson

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 7, 1989No. 88-3362PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

Cain, previously a probationary police officer for the Village of Herscher (“Herscher”), alleges that her former employer violated her fourteenth amendment procedural due process rights. She is suing for compensatory and punitive damages and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. The district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, and Cain appeals. Because the plaintiff has not alleged a constitutionally protected property interest, we affirm.

*1425I.

We review the dismissal of a complaint, and accordingly take all well-pleaded facts as true. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. William N. Ledford v. Michael J. Sullivan, Gordon A. Abrahamson, Patrick KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Abcarian v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Grounds v. Tolar Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Manley v. Bruce Law & Hinsdale Twp. High Sch. Dist. 86Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Ronald Swick v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API