Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Strandburg
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 11, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
This proceeding arises upon an order directing Joseph Epstein to show cause “ why he should not be directed to pay to Gustave Anderson, as the Administrator of the Estate of Charles G. Strandburg, deceased, for the account of said estate, the sum of Nine Hundred Thirty-seven ($937) Dollars, with interest, or, in default of such payment, why he should not be punished for contempt of court. * * * ”
On November 19, 1924, a petition was filed in this court by Joseph Epstein, acting as attorney for Oliver Perry Strandburg, in which the latter sought the issuance of letters of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hathaway v. . County of DelawareNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Lewis v. . DuaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Tebo v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- In re AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- Grant v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of ZweigNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of HillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of JaffeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- Card v. HoughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1942