Legal Opinion
State v. Rathbun
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 23, 2004No. 30404-0-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
101 P.3d 119 (2004)
124 Wash.App. 372
STATE of Washington, Appellant,
v.
Robert K. RATHBUN, Respondent.
No. 30404-0-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
November 23, 2004.
Gerald R. Fuller, Grays Harbor County Prosecutors Office, Montesano, WA, for Appellant.
Steven Grant McNeill, Attorney at Law, Steven McNeill Law Office, Montesano, WA, for Respondent.
BRIDGEWATER, J.
The State appeals the trial court's order of dismissal nunc pro tunc, in which it found that evidence of methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia was improperly seized. Robert K. Rathbun had been working on a truck, but at the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Black v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PattonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. CaseresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. QuinlivanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.