Legal Opinion

State v. Quinlivan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 5, 2008No. 25796-7-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — One of the “jealously guarded” exceptions to the general requirement of a search warrant is the search incident to arrest. The state Supreme Court established what has been called a “bright-line rule” in State v. Stroud.1 The rule is that police can search a vehicle incident to arrest without the authority of a search warrant. Here, a deputy sheriff stopped a pickup truck. The driver left the truck, locked it, and sat on a curb. He refused to give the deputy the keys to the truck. The deputy arrested him, seized the keys, searched the truck, and found drugs under a seat. The question…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PattonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API