Legal Opinion

Wantlan v. White

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1862PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a decision upon a writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

The question in this ease is, whether a volunteer in the army of the United States, as a private, who is under eighteen years of age, can be held to the service by virtue of his enlistment; and the Court is unanimously of the opinion that he can not be so held.

If he is to be regarded as a militiaman, in the service by the call of the President, he can not be held, because he is not a person subject to the Executive call under the Constitution and the acts of Congress. The President has never been authorized to call any but militia; and militia has always been defined, both by Congress and the…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. McCready v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Forster v. ForsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Ex parte HolmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. SimonsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API