Wantlan v. White
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from a decision upon a writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
The question in this ease is, whether a volunteer in the army of the United States, as a private, who is under eighteen years of age, can be held to the service by virtue of his enlistment; and the Court is unanimously of the opinion that he can not be so held.
If he is to be regarded as a militiaman, in the service by the call of the President, he can not be held, because he is not a person subject to the Executive call under the Constitution and the acts of Congress. The President has never been authorized to call any but militia; and militia has always been defined, both by Congress and the…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- McCready v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Forster v. ForsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Ex parte HolmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. SimonsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.