Legal Opinion

Asbury v. Stout

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided July 10, 2025No. 8:25-cv-00141Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION SAMUEL W. ASBURY, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:25-cv-141-KKM-AEP KEVIN P. STOUT, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________ ORDER Samuel Asbury alleges that six defendants intentionally harmed his law practice and seeks recompense and an order protecting from future harm. Second Am. Compl. (Doc. 6). The defendants argue that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Asbury’s claims and that the Middle District of Florida is an improper venue. MTD I (Doc. 14); MTD II (Doc. 17); MTD III (Doc. 18). For the reasons…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API