Reeves v. Roberts
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Van Zandt. Tried below before the Hon. Felix J. McCord.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
This cause was tried without a jury, and the court found that the lands which the defendants claimed in their several answers were not a part of the Welch grant through which the appellant claims title.
If this finding is supported by sufficient evidence to sustain it, properly admitted, then it becomes unnecessary to consider such questions as relate to the titles of the defendants through the grants under which they claim.
There is no controversy as to the point at which the northeast corner of the Welch grant, under the calls of the patent, is to be found; all…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Booker v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Kelly v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Cox v. PiwonkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Maddox v. Dayton Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Maddox v. Dayton Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.